Browse The Legal Dictionary

These new widespread-legislation courts, however, are premised on a mix of U.S. Constitutional Law, English widespread law, and the Bible, all filtered via an typically racist and anti-Semitic world view that holds the U.S. legal system to be illegitimate. These widespread-law courts imitate the formalities of the U.S. justice system, issuing subpoenas, making legal indictments, and hearing cases. Most of their circumstances involve Divorce decrees and foreclosure actions. Many of the individuals on the courts or seeking their help are in dire monetary circumstances. They want to prevent the lack of their property by having a common-law court declare them freed from the loans they have secured from banks.

When the federal government seeks to punish somebody for an offense that was not deemed legal at the time it was committed, the rule of regulation is violated because the federal government exceeds its authorized authority to punish. The rule of law requires that authorities impose liability only insofar as the law will permit. Government exceeds its authority when a person is held to answer for an act that was legally permissible at the outset but was retroactively made illegal. This precept is reflected by the prohibition in opposition to Ex Post Facto Laws in the U.S. The widespread legislation is derived from two sources, the widespread law of England, and the practice and decision of our personal courts. In some states the English frequent regulation has been adopted by statute. There is no common rule to …